BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:2.0 PRODID:-//132.216.98.100//NONSGML kigkonsult.se iCalcreator 2.20.4// BEGIN:VEVENT UID:20250626T163022EDT-4754mtgwlu@132.216.98.100 DTSTAMP:20250626T203022Z DESCRIPTION:Professor Ali Polar\n\n2024 Howard Street Robinson Medalist \n \nUniversity of Windsor \n\nFriday\, November 29 \n\n11- 12pm \n\nFDA 232 \n\nThe Mechanism of Archean Continental Growth: Evidence from Field Relat ionships\, and Volcanic Rock and TTG Geochemistry\n\nAbstract: \n\nArchean terrains consist predominantly (>90%) of contemporaneous tonalite-trondhj emitegranodiorite suites (TTGs) and greenstone belts\, representing relict fragments of early continental crust. One of the most contentious areas o f Earth Science today is the tectonic mechanism by which Archean continent al crust was generated. Although studies on Archean terrains over the past four decades have enhanced our understanding of how these terrains formed \, the nature of large-scale tectonic processes that produced Archean cont inental crust still remains highly controversial. This controversy and ong oing substantial debate have centered around opposing uniformitarian and n on-uniformitarian tectonic models. The uniformitarian models propose that modern-style plate tectonic processes (e.g.\, subduction\, accretion\, col lision) operated in the Archean\, whereas the non-uniformitarian models po stulate that vertical tectonics or other unknown processes (e.g.\, sagduct ion\, catalytic delamination\, heat pipe\, mantle upwelling\, stagnant lid ) operated in the Archean. The question is which of these models is suppor ted by the Archean rock record?\n\nA review of the main lithological\, str uctural\, and geochemical data from 4.0 to 2.5 Ga Archean terrains reveals that they were generated at convergent plate boundaries by accretion of o ceanic arcs\, continental arcs\, oceanic crust\, and trench turbidites. Ex tensive geochemical data (>8\,200 samples) from Eoarchean to Neoarchean vo lcanic rocks plot mostly in the oceanic arc\, continental arc\, and back-a rc fields in tectonic setting discrimination diagrams\, which suggest that subduction-related geodynamic processes operated throughout the Archean. Similarly\, a comparison of large trace element data (>3500 samples) from Eoarchean to Neoarchean TTGs with those from Phanerozoic arc TTGs (4100 sa mples) suggests that most Archean TTGs also formed in arc environments. Th e positive Pb and negative Nb anomalies of most Archean volcanic rocks and TTGs are fully consistent with subduction-related settings. The temporal variations in the incompatible trace element ratios of Archean volcanic ro cks and TTGs\, coupled with their lithological associations\, demonstrate that intra-oceanic arc magmatism was prominent in the Eoarchean. The trace element systematics of Paleoarchean volcanic rocks and TTGs signify the b eginning of Andeanstyle continental arc magmatism between 3.5 and 3.2 Ga. From ~ 3.2 Ga there was a gradual transition in intra-oceanic arc magmatis m to more abundant Andean-type continental margin magmatism in the form of voluminous TTGs and sanukitoids. From 3.2 to 2.5 Ga juvenile oceanic crus t and arcs continued to form\, accompanied by more active continental marg in magmatism until 2.7-2.5 Ga\, by which time there were sufficient crusta l rocks to amalgamate into incipient large continents\, the fragmentation of which started the first complete classical Wilson Cycle Plate Tectonics of breaking apart and re-assembling large continental masses. Field evide nce for uniformitarian tectonic processes in the Archean rock record is ex uberant\, whereas field evidence to support the non-uniformitarian models is lacking. 2024 Howard Street Rob\n\n \n DTSTART:20241129T160000Z DTEND:20241129T170000Z SUMMARY:EPS Seminar Series: Professor Ali Polat URL:/eps/channels/event/eps-seminar-series-professor-a li-polat-360192 END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR